He still would get recognized as the founder of the !PGM project (and as someone who has stopped maintaining the project for over half a year). ๐ค๐งโโ๏ธ๐
!PIZZA
!INDEED
!WEIRD
He still would get recognized as the founder of the !PGM project (and as someone who has stopped maintaining the project for over half a year). ๐ค๐งโโ๏ธ๐
!PIZZA
!INDEED
!WEIRD
Yep, indeed, true. This is why I've become so selective of the projects in which I involve myself. Solid teams make solid tokens. ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!HOPE
!INDEED
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
That also means that a project (on Hive) that has more than one owner is (much) more likely to be active longer (and progress further). ๐ค๐ค๐
!DIY
!LUV
If ever one of the owners (hopefully not) decides to quit (such as for the DUO project), the remaining owner still has a (good) chance of finding a new co-owner or passing the project to a new owner. ๐
!DIY
!LUV
If that were to happen, that would be the hope for sure. ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!DIY
!LUV
Finding a co-owner still looks better than passing the ownership to someone else, as having a co-owner means that there would be at least two people again who would continue managing the project. ๐ค๐ค
!DIY
Yes, true, if a suitable individual presents themselves. The more solid people the better. Solid teams make solid tokens! ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!DIY
I wonder if a Hive project would ever have at least 10 co-owners (who actually contribute to the project). ๐ค๐
!DIY
!LUV
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS