I agree, if his project were really important to him, that's what he would do, from my perspective. π π π β¨ π€
!DIY
!HOPE
!INDEED
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Β Trending
He still would get recognized as the founder of the !PGM project (and as someone who has stopped maintaining the project for over half a year). π€π§ββοΈπ
!PIZZA
!INDEED
!WEIRD
Yep, indeed, true. This is why I've become so selective of the projects in which I involve myself. Solid teams make solid tokens. π π π β¨ π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
That also means that a project (on Hive) that has more than one owner is (much) more likely to be active longer (and progress further). π€π€π
!DIY
!LUV
If ever one of the owners (hopefully not) decides to quit (such as for the DUO project), the remaining owner still has a (good) chance of finding a new co-owner or passing the project to a new owner. π
!DIY
!LUV
If that were to happen, that would be the hope for sure. π π π β¨ π€
!DIY
!LUV
Finding a co-owner still looks better than passing the ownership to someone else, as having a co-owner means that there would be at least two people again who would continue managing the project. π€π€
!DIY
Yes, true, if a suitable individual presents themselves. The more solid people the better. Solid teams make solid tokens! π π π β¨ π€
!DIY
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS
Don't be shy - share some DIY!
You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS