Exactly, that's the phrase that did it! π π π β¨ π€
!LOLZ
!HUG
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Β Trending
I think that we should consider a token burned only if it is sent to the @null account. π€π€
!LUV
Yep, exactly! That's the definition that I use. π π π β¨ π€
!LUV
Looks like basically all of the confusion on my older comment is when I said "burning tokens" where the tokens are not sent to null. π€π
!PIZZA !LUV
Your assessment is correct! You got it! π π π β¨ π€
LUV
PIZZA
Do you mean "your" instead of you're? π€ππ€
Anyway, maybe the LOLZ burner bot needs a change of name because of the definition of token burning! π
!LUV
!PIZZA
Hehe...yes, that was a typo. It's been corrected.
That might be helpful, though a new bot would have to be created, since names can't be changed. πππβ¨π€
!LUV
!PIZZA
Looks like correcting you're to "your" also removes the exclamation marks before the !LUV and !PIZZA tipping bot commands! ππ
I don't think that bots would have any significant problem in case a new Hive account (which will have a different name) is created for them, since all parts of the code containing the old username and private keys should simply be replaced with the new ones. π€π€π
I know, it's such a wild thing to happen! Siliy bots!
Well, yes, of course, changing operations to the new accounts would be simple, but that would not be changing the name, which is why I mentioned it. π π π β¨ π€
!LUV
!PIZZA
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @tydynrain.
(2/3)