I do not use "socialism" because it puts a focus on "social." Like the "collective" is more important than the Individual. Abundancism is focuses on Individual freedom.
"Communism" too focuses on the "community." Not the Individual and the freedom Each has.
Why do People think I don't grasp the differences...?
Socialism uses gov't force to gain compliance.
Communism, as defined by marx and stalin, does the same.
An-com rejects force as a means.
But, good luck getting someone that hasn't read a book since their high skool teacher forced them to read a book to understand that.
I know you know, you have a grasp of the subject that few others can approach.
I'm just trying to move the definitions closer to reality.
Socialism is slavery.
Marxist communism is slavery.
Both use force to gain compliance.
An-com has no slavery.
An-com doesn't use force to attain its goals.
I am an an-ab! Anarcho-abundancist. Because as long as We have the need to account for Our energy added into the system so as to survive, that money/power WILL be aimed for by psychopaths that lust after power over Others,
And then, He who has the gold (money in whatever form) will make the rules.