Hi. Was the conflict started with your knowledge?
it seems to me that @theguruasia with her moral qualities does not fit the position and casts a shadow of negativity on the whole project.
Question: will it be possible to resolve the conflict in a non-public way, because I have many more relevant topics to publish, except this one?
https://ecency.com/politics/@vp-freelance/re-oleksiitkachuk-2024223t456542z
!WEED
Yeah that's true, that guy oleksiitkachuk is spamming and should be able to receive flags. I will talk to theguruasia and find out what is going on. If any links you burnt HELIOS to issue downvotes didn't go through, send me the post links and I will issue refunds. It looks like the ones I checked went through.
Is there any procedure for disputing a downvote, or is this the first time this situation has arisen?
!WEED
Thank you very much for spending your time to find out the rightness of our disputes!
My question was not about refunds, but about a possible system bug or other malfunction.
I would like to find out for myself for the future, is Guruasia a representative of your project, or is it just an enthusiast pretending to be a member of the administration? I don't want to set up a discord and thought I could keep in touch with guruazia about the Helios work.
How can I get on the white list of those who are not allowed to buy negative votes? Perhaps I should delegate more power to helios for this?
I would like to be able to communicate with this passenger on equal terms without the risk of financial punishment on his part. especially since I cannot reciprocate his feelings due to his being on the white list!
After your conversation with guruasia, he went nuts and downvotes my posts with your service)))))
My analysis posts have links to the sources of the information they are talking about. They are reputable media that no one accuses of propaganda or misinformation, it's strange that I'm getting in trouble on the hive for this.
Especially since the last update to your rules, I don't use your service to promote content that could be interpreted ambiguously!
There are no calls for hate speech or calls for illegal activity in my posts.
It seems to me, but personal dislike of guruasia is not a reason to banish from the platform users who have a different opinion from his, abide by the rules of the Hive and generate relevant original content.
It is very unfair when whitelisted users infringe on the rights of regular users.
What actions should a user take to be removed from the whitelist?
It's nice to deal with adequate people!
Have a nice day and night!