I am an Ethical One. I uphold the three Laws of Ethics. These Laws are Natural Law, not legalates (a term I coined) – all the acts, codes, statutes, mandates, ordinances, and such contained in the legal system. They spring from Our nature, and not from the wiles of lawyers (legalatyers?) or commerce. The Laws are thus:
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
As You can see, these list the things that no One would say were okay to do to Them. No One, if asked if it’s okay to kill Them without Their consent would say, “Sure!” Which actually is giving consent and leaves the question unanswered.
Anything else is a matter of taste.
Sure there may be things Most would eschew, but there are Some who would love to indulge. Some would love to be hurt and would consent to it, but in giving consent, it does not break a Law.
So when I see Ethical things “outlawed” (outlegalated) and unEthical things made legal, I know We have a problem on Our planet.
A primary issue is the legalizing of sex with children. Sending Them subliminal messages of sex in cartoons and movies… Anything sexual related to children. Because children cannot give fully informed consent. Ergo, assaulting Their flesh is unEthical. Period. But I see the ghastly legal/governmental system moving towards supporting that very unEthical thing.
Neither can children give fully informed consent to having Their bodies hacked and slashed in cosmetic surgery. So Many express serious regret that They made an uninformed choice to emulate the opposite sex. For They are told They can be the opposite sex if They get Their flesh hacked at. Very unEthical.
And then there are the prohibitions that are not anyOne’s right to proclaim. My favorite example, because it illustrates so well the absurdity, is the collecting of rain water. There is zero point to making such a proclamation, that Others cannot catch water falling from the sky, but to create “criminals” to suck money from, and to control People.
And there is nothing Ethical in One controlling anOther against Their consent.
When a system promotes unEthical things is where I draw the line. I cannot consent to that system and there is nothing that gives anOther a right to tell Me what I may and may not do as long as what I do is Ethical.
And there is surely no excuse for consenting to a system that allows unEthical things. That metes “justice” to the Ones who can afford it, and screws the Ones who cannot.
For this reason, I do not consent to that whole psychopathic legal/governmental system in the least. And I ponder why so Many do consent. I have seen so Many, who have been screwed by an unEthical legalate just shrug and say, “It’s the law.”
Of course, it’s not the Law – they are three and define Ethics.
It’s a convolution of things to serve the Ones who take from Us and live richly. The motive to most legalates is to enrich Some at the expense of Others. Sure, some legalates do address issues of Ethics, but the vast majority are commerce-related. Make an Ethical thing Some are doing – say, smoking cannabis for example – “illegal” and the plant that threatens the allopathic “medicine” sales can be removed.
And People fined for money, and the threat to cotton, paper, and other industries eliminated. It never was about protecting Us from anything. It has always been about money.
Money buys the things and the People to unEthical ends. People to pretend there is a deadly virus roaming about. People to manufacture ghastly jabs. People to claim “safe and effective.” People to turn a blind eye to the clear evidence of damage from the jabs. Worldwide.
Nothing about the plannedemic was Ethical.
Humanity was defrauded, health stolen, and murdered willfully. And legally. Legally, as all major “news” corporations are “entertainment” corporations and this made it “okay” to lie to Us, because it’s “just entertainment.” No truth need be told. We might want to see the whole of what They offer there as a play (see What a Play linked below).
To present as truth something that is a lie – which is what virtually all “news” is – is very unEthical. At the very least a disclaimer should be presented in readily readable form that states it’s fiction for Our “enjoyment.” “Small print” is a ruse to legally (but not Ethically) sneak things past Us.
And the redefining of words – which the legal system does almost exclusively – such that We must go to “law” school to grasp, is extremely unEthical. Ethics are straightforward. If One needs to hide something from the public One is doing something unEthical. For no Ethical thing needs to be hidden.
I will not stand for this unEthical ruse against the People here on My planet. I do not stand under the legal/governmental system. I will not condone its existence. I cannot accept the idea that, because most everyOne else is duped into obeying the legalates, I must as well.
My questions to You are… Will You keep supporting the idea that the legalates have anything to do with Law? Will You go along to get along, giving Your power to liars, thieves, and murderers? Or will You be one to serve Ethics? Will You stand in aggregate with Me against that ghastly system?
Will You be an Ethical One?
Please share My work to bring Our planet back to Ethical standing. When enough of Us know We do not have to consent to being defrauded, stolen from, tortured and murdered – legally – and can stand sovereign on Ethical ground... When enough of Us take Our stand for Ethics, We will co-create vastly better – for Us and for Our children.
Links:
The Detailed Blueprint (for a Society Of Ethical Sovereigns) (7 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Ethical Trumps Legal (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/ethical-trumps-legal:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Self Defense and Ethics (3 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/self-defense-and-ethics:1?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Foundational Rights (4 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/foundational-rights:e?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-simplicity-of-ethics
What a Play! (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/what-a-play
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.