When People think of defrauding, theft, torture, murder, and other things like that, They usually would say that the Ones doing such things are evil, that the things They are doing are evil. So why would it be that I do not see those things as evil?
When I look upon such things, I see them as unEthical. I don’t see “evil” or “good.” These things suggest “otherworldly” elements. Demons and angels. And I am very down to earth, having no religion – was raised with lots of love and Ethics, but no religion – so the ideas of “evil” and “good” do not fit well with me.
I know that there are three Laws (not to be confused with the legalates of the psychopathic legal/governmental system), and these are the foundation of common law. They are think We all know are things We should not do – though the psychopaths amongst Us do not care that They should not do them.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
None of Us would say these things would be okay to do to Us. We all know they are wrong. Outside of these things, everything is a matter of taste. Doing these things, therefore, defines unEthical. And if asked if these are okay to be done to One, if One says, “Yes,” then One is giving consent and leaving the question unanswered…
And though there are areas where One might quibble – the planet belongs to all of Us, and taking an acre of land (homesteading) might be said to break the second Law, but yet, where no One has claimed Their acre, We can make claim and build Our lives there – in virtually all cases, it’s pretty clear.
So when I look at things, I see unEthical (“evil”) – all that breaks those three Laws – Ethical – everything that does not break those three Laws – with “good” being the upholding of the Betterment Ethic. The Betterment Ethic is to keep an eye out for ways to make things better for Those around You and around the globe and creating them.
From a smile to brighten anOther’s day to solving great problems.
Of course, the legal system is about as unclear as it gets. No One knows even the number of legalates, let along the content of them all! And the scum in that system say that “ignorance of the law (legalate) is no excuse.” I have covered this in several past articles but cover it again to impress on You, the reader, the fact that We would best dump that system for Ethics (see The Simplicity of Ethics linked below).
No One has a right to tell You that You cannot do things that don’t break those Laws. Unless You’re lying (breaking the third Law), You can say anything You want. There’s no such thing as “hate speech.” I may not like what You say, but it is Your right to say it and My responsibility to accept it or counter it with My own words.
Unless You’re on some Other’s property without permission, You can collect all the rainwater You want.
There are things that Many don’t think about as unEthical – and one thing is littering. I did a video on that, in fact, back when I was making videos (the arthritis making it just too much to continue, so I write articles). It’s called Why Littering is UnEthical and is a short story about just that. It too is linked below.
And links here will lead to more links that offer additional data on how We can solve for the psychopaths in control on Our planet. For if We stand like deer in headlights, just pointing and saying, OMG!, the psychopaths will destroy Humanity, Self and freedom.
Perhaps You can think of things that are unEthical, like littering is. Let Me know Your thoughts!
Links:
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-simplicity-of-ethics
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/blurt/@amaterasusolar/the-simplicity-of-ethics
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/The-Simplicity-of-Ethics:0
Why Littering is UnEthical (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/why-littering-is-unethical:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Self Defense and Ethics (3 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/self-defense-and-ethics:1?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
The ONLY Winning Move is Not to Play (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-only-winning-move-is-not-to-play
The ONLY Winning Move is Not to Play (article): https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/blurt/@amaterasusolar/229efy-the-only-winning-move-is-not-to-play
The ONLY Winning Move is Not to Play (article): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/The-ONLY-Winning-Move-is-Not-to-Play:2
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.