I will make Ethical contract but never legal. How about You? Perhaps I should explain the difference.
Ethical contracts are straightforward, with no small print, no “differently defined” words – where any word might be ambiguous, it is defined immediately and clearly. All parties in an Ethical contract grasp all of the contract, and everything is above board.
Legal contracts, on the other hand, are nearly never Ethical. Small print abounds, often so small that reading it is nigh impossible, hiding many things in “differently defined” words, and being almost impossible to grasp. Why this is acceptable is beyond Me.
The whole legal system is truly a farce. If You have money, You can pay for “justice.” If You have no money, You’re screwed. And while They try to suggest that, in “criminal” cases You can get free “representation,” oft times the “representation” is working for the moneyed interests, not You.
Rarely is true justice done.
With Ethical contracts, the aim is for All involved to know fully what the deal is. The aim is always justice. And in fact, Ethical trumps legal. The legal system is a Human creation and so very often makes unEthical things “okay.” The system can make legal the proclamation that jabs are “safe and effective,” that unicorns...er...viruses abound. And many, many other unEthical things.
Ethics are entirely based on Natural Law. The three Laws of Ethics are Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do.
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
The legal system is all about defrauding in the way it redefines words and hides things in tiny print. A day does not go by that I don’t wonder why People consent to that whole ghastly system as if it is the be all-end all when it is so unEthical.
Me? I do not consent to it in the least. Approach Me on Ethical ground.
I can do any Ethical thing I choose. I can collect rain water. I can decline death jabs. I can do anything I choose to Myself. And lest I break those three Laws, I will expect and demand to be left alone.
I have a bond for 100 million dollars to cover any liability I may incur. And I am unlikely to need it… I operate with great care in all I do, and do nothing unEthical.
The legal system (admiralty law, the law of the sea) came onto the land through the sewers. The sewers serve the Humans living on land and are the connection to the sea. Through that avenue They justified bringing that unEthical (pirate) system into Our lives, taking away common law – which is founded on the three Laws.
Through the sewers We were beset, and pirated of Our sovereignty and Our Ethics.
Tied to the legal system, actually a part of it, are the governmental systems in place today. Small wonder money buys “justice” in a system based on piracy. Small wonder Most of Us just take Our losses and cannot pursue justice because We cannot afford to. The whole psychopathic legal/governmental system is designed to screw the Ones who are not rich, to pirate from Us.
So again, I ask if You will make Ethical contracts and eschew legal ones. Will You stand on the higher ground, above the sewer of the legal system? Will You stand sovereign under Ethics, or be a victim of the system run by psychopaths? Let Me know in the comments.
If You found this useful, all I ask in payment is that You share to 10 People – post in groups and on forums, email to Others, share the work in person… I will be well paid when You do!
Links:
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-simplicity-of-ethics
I Do Not Consent! (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/i-do-not-consent
Under Duress Only (article): https://peakd.com/deepdives/@amaterasusolar/under-duress-only
Walking the Walk (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/walking-the-walk
Walking the Walk Some More (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/walking-the-walk-some-more
Lip Service to Freedom (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/lip-service-to-freedom
The ONLY Winning Move is Not to Play (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-only-winning-move-is-not-to-play
Ethical Trumps Legal (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/ethical-trumps-legal:c?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.