I agree that the DHF is a cunning approach, but the problem can be in the details. Also, DHF does not guarantee funding for the whole project duration because one option is that it has to reach a certain limit, which someone, a whale, can quickly melt down if they don't like your project. On the other hand, as @mypathtofire mentioned, some who have reached that limit are just living on their laurels. It seems to me that we still have a lot to learn in this decentralized world.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
You are right to point out that at the moment, the dhf has two weaknesses. There is no guarantee that full funding is provided and it offers no incentive for a project to be profitable. If projects start to rely only on dhf funding, I don't see it as a sustainable solution.
Maybe there should be a statement (like on EU projects, haha) that the DHF provides 50% funding or something like that, and the initiator of the project has to provide 50% himself (he can collect donations in some special fund or Hive account opened for this) as Liotes has... but here we are back to trust