Intellectual Laziness!

Some of the content creators post the same thing and expecting that over time, they get paid more by providing the same quality for years. It's fine if they have a low bar of expectations like being contented on what everyone else tips but to be exude some level of envy is just entitlement. Post what you want, just level your expectations on what you can expect from the platform. Some people really improve their blogs over time and some just stagnate.

Kung ano po ang itninanim natin ngayon yoon po ang ating aanihin natin bukas (analogy).

The stake present on @hiveph account is built by the community members that were present in the past and now. At some point, there was a group that said why don't we build something for everyone and it snowballed into what it is now. The amount of HP present is proportionate to the cumulative effort everyone is putting into the account.

With a community that spans more than hundreds and yet less than 30-50 people actually give a flying fuck about it, it's not really a surprise to see there's less progress than expected from its years of existing on the platform. Now picture this from my point of view where people who contributed none from that building process expect HivePH to be supportive of them. If I had to pick which to support given the limited amount of voting power the community has, my bias will always be for the people that do bother with the community.

There was a point in time when everyone had free admission and the screening process for membership was non-existent, you know what happened? nothing. So when more perks were added to qualified members and memberships had thresholds in place, it's when the community started to gain more resources by investing in those that do matter. I'm all for supporting people out there but if they're playing a selfish strategy when you're game requires team work, I think I'll make a pass on these few.

With regards to the voteme privilege, it has been a source of headache since you're not only managing voting power and stake, you also need to adjust expectations on how people want to be rewarded just for existing on the community. There's the aspect of keeping the bot up and liquidity available all the time so that delegators get paid which is not a responsibility passed on the community.

Good governance looks boring. The fact that there's little drama on the community means most problems get nipped in the bud. It's only when things don't work that people start to notice we're doing something, take for instance how Kembot is online, only when the voteme is down do people notice the bot needs a coder that fixes things and they are allocating their precious time on the community for free when in fact, doing the same job for a client will costs us hundreds of dollars. Like I said, a lot of things that keep this community running are concerns aren't shared with majority of the members because that's not their assumed responsibility.