Film Review: Bonnie and Clyde (1967)

in Movies & TV Shows2 days ago

(source: tmdb.org)

One of Hollywood’s most enduring traits is its ability to transmute historical footnotes into cultural myths. Few examples illustrate this better than Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde (1967), which elevated two minor Depression-era criminals—Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow—into immortal icons of rebellion. Their real-life crime spree, marked by ineptitude and brutality, was dwarfed by the grander narrative of American true crime, yet the film recast them as tragic antiheroes, their legend amplified by Penn’s audacious direction and the era’s countercultural zeitgeist. The film itself transcended mere storytelling, becoming a mythic touchstone for the New Hollywood movement—a seismic shift in filmmaking that rejected studio-era conventions in favour of gritty realism and moral ambiguity. Penn’s work, dismissed initially as vulgar and violent, would later be hailed as a harbinger of this cinematic revolution, cementing its status as both a cultural artefact and a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The story opens in a desolate Texas town, where Bonnie Parker (played by Faye Dunaway), a restless waitress stifled by the drudgery of the Great Depression, encounters Clyde Barrow (played by Warren Beatty), a smirking ex-con attempting to steal her mother’s car. Their flirtatious banter—Bonnie’s dare for Clyde to commit robbery, his half-hearted compliance—sets the tone for a relationship fuelled by performative bravado and mutual exploitation. What begins as a lark evolves into a nihilistic odyssey as they recruit the dim-witted mechanic C.W. Moss (played by Michael J. Pollard) and Clyde’s brother Buck (played by Gene Hackman) and his pious wife Blanche (played by Estelle Parsons), whose shrill hysterics mask a pragmatic survival instinct.

Penn juxtaposes the gang’s slapstick escapades—bungled heists, chaotic getaways—with sudden eruptions of graphic violence, culminating in a relentless manhunt led by Texas Ranger Frank Hamer (played by Denver Pyle). Unlike the historical Hamer, a stoic lawman, this iteration is driven by personal vengeance, a narrative liberty that amplifies the film’s thematic clash between youthful defiance and institutional oppression. The episodic structure, reminiscent of folk tales, underscores their descent from reckless adventurers to doomed outlaws, their deaths preordained by the opening’s archival photographs.

Bonnie and Clyde emerged during the twilight of Hollywood’s studio system, as the antiquated Production Code crumbled under the weight of societal change. Warren Beatty, both star and producer, clashed fiercely with Warner Bros. patriarch Jack L. Warner, who deemed the film’s violence and sexual undertones commercially toxic. Penn’s opening scene—Bonnie nude, framed suggestively yet coyly—pushed boundaries, though its true provocation lay in its visceral violence. The use of squibs to simulate bullet wounds, pioneered here, rendered death grotesquely intimate, a far cry from the sanitised gunfights of classical Hollywood.

Warner’s fears of glorifying crime echoed critiques of 1930s gangster films, yet the studio’s reluctance only galvanised Beatty. His guerrilla marketing tactics, including leveraging the film’s controversial reception, transformed a potential flop into a sleeper hit, symbolising the generational rift between Old Hollywood’s conservatism and New Hollywood’s irreverence.

Initial reviews were scathing: Variety dismissed the protagonists as “moronic,” while The New York Times condemned its “grubby” mix of farce and bloodshed. Yet audiences, particularly young viewers, flocked to theatres, enthralled by its rebellious spirit. Word-of-mouth buzz spurred a critical reappraisal, with figures like Roger Ebert championing it as “a milestone in American cinema”. The film garnered 10 Oscar nominations, winning Best Supporting Actress (Parsons) and Cinematography (Burnett Guffey), while its global influence manifested in Serge Gainsbourg’s chart-topping ballad Bonnie and Clyde (1968).

The duo’s mythos permeated fashion (Dunaway’s berets), music, and even politics, their image repurposed by 1960s counterculture as symbols of resistance—a testament to the film’s alchemical blend of history and fantasy.

Penn’s debt to the French New Wave, particularly Breathless (1960), is evident in the protagonists’ existential ennui and abrupt tonal shifts. Yet beyond the climactic massacre—a balletic orgy of slow-motion bullets and squibs—the film lacks the avant-garde abstraction of Godard or Truffaut. Screenwriters David Newman and Robert Benton initially sought Truffaut as director, envisioning a European arthouse sensibility, but Beatty’s involvement steered the project toward mainstream accessibility. The result is a hybrid: a populist rebellion dressed in art-house trappings, its radicalism diluted yet potent enough to shock 1967 audiences.

The film’s picaresque structure—a series of vignettes punctuated by violence—reflects its origins as a script inspired by Jules and Jim (1962). While Newman and Benton imbue the duo with pseudo-revolutionary motives (robbing banks to avenge disenfranchised farmers), their politics remain nebulous. A scene where Clyde invites a dispossessed Black farmer to shoot a bank’s foreclosure sign teeters on social commentary but ultimately reduces systemic injustice to a fleeting gesture. The Barrow Gang’s mythologisation as “folk heroes” feels less like a critique of capitalism than a romanticised fantasy, their rebellion devoid of ideological coherence.

The film’s true resonance lay in its audience. Baby Boomers, embroiled in anti-Vietnam protests and rejecting their parents’ conformity, saw parallels in Bonnie and Clyde’s defiance of authority. C.W. Moss’s tattoo—a source of paternal scorn—symbolised generational conflict, while Hamer’s vendetta embodied the “establishment’s” hypocrisy. Penn’s portrayal of law enforcement as vindictive, rather than virtuous, mirrored growing distrust in institutions, rendering the duo’s demise not just inevitable but morally ambiguous.

Five decades on, the film’s shock value has dimmed; its violence, once revolutionary, now feels routine. The sparse soundtrack, reliant on diegetic folk tunes, lacks the emotional heft of contemporary scores, while Penn’s direction occasionally veers into melodrama. Yet the performances endure: Beatty balances charm and pathos as the impotent Clyde, while Dunaway’s fiery magnetism heralded her ascent as New Hollywood’s definitive diva. Hackman and Pollard steal scenes with their tragicomic ineptitude, and Gene Wilder’s cameo—a nervy undertaker kidnapped by the gang—hints at the dark humour that would define his career.

Penn’s film was neither the first nor last adaptation of the duo’s saga. The 1958 B-movie The Bonnie Parker Story framed them as cheap thrills, while 2013’s miniseries Bonnie & Clyde leaned into romantic tragedy. Notably, 2019’s The Highwaymen reframed the manhunt through Hamer’s perspective, demythologising the duo as reckless killers—a stark contrast to Penn’s romanticisation. Each iteration reflects its era’s anxieties, yet none have matched the 1967 version’s cultural imprint, a testament to its mythic potency.

Bonnie and Clyde remains a paradox: a film that mythologised its subjects even as it exposed the hollow core of their rebellion. Its blend of brutality and beauty, comedy and tragedy, encapsulates the chaos of the 1960s, bridging Old Hollywood’s artifice and New Hollywood’s raw immediacy. While its stylistic innovations have been assimilated into mainstream cinema, its legacy endures as a cultural Rorschach test—a mirror reflecting audiences’ perennial fascination with outsiders who live fast, die young, and leave a bullet-riddled corpse.

RATING: 7/10 (+++)

Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com
Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/
InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo

Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax
InLeo: https://inleo.io/signup?referral=drax.leo
Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax
1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG
ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7
BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9

Posted Using INLEO

Sort:  

Yes, such movies are rare these days. Great to read an authentic review.