I have read some comments on Hive proposal posts saying that the number of active users is more important than the number of new users. 🤓
!PIZZA
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
I'd say that's true. Consistently active accounts are more important than lots of accounts which may or may not be active. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!PIZZA
However, there are a lot of talks about how the term "active Hive user" is defined. 🤯😅
!PIZZA
Well, obviously if an account follows curation trails, voting can't be used as a criterion. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!INDEED
Even if a Hive account is manually used to vote, then there should still be a standard way to measure how many votes (of particular Voting Percentages) per given period of time will qualify the account as "active" (relative to automatic curation if also used). 🤔🤯🤓
!PIZZA
Posts, comments, and replies would work better as metrics than votes I'd say. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!BEER
That's !INDEED true, but content consumers on Hive (who only read and curate but seldom reply) might be seen as "not active" even if they manually vote a lot. 🤯😅
!INDEED that's a good point, as I know there are quite a few of the quiet lurker sorts too. Determining authentic account activity is slightly challenging it would seem. Well, I know I'm active! 😁🙏💚✨🤙
The "active Hive authors" would then be much easier (with a simple metric such as "posting or commenting at least once a week") to measure relative to "active Hive users". 🤔🤓
!LOLZ !INDEED
View or trade BEER.
Hey @savvytester, here is a little bit of BEER from @tydynrain for you. Enjoy it!
Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.