The quote, at first, seemed like something of a tautology, one of those pseudo-logic arguments in which the conclusion affirms what is already said in the premises, giving a circular structure to the 'argumentation'. But, when you explain it, then its possible meaning and depth becomes apparent.

Thank you for that @pedrobrito2004! I'm grateful that you appreciate how I fleshed it out. I'm not a fan of circular logic either, and I do my best with the quotes that l share to choose ones that are simple and clear, and yet have a greater, sometimes somewhat hidden depth to them.

Thanks for sharing it and asking the right questions for us to ask ourselves about these issues.

It's always my honor, pleasure, and privilege to share, and my greatest intention and desire in doing so is to help catalyze useful and beneficial shifts in perspective. 😁🙏💚✨